Are markets playing catch-up to the Fed?


Despite fears of a more aggressive Fed in the face of persistent inflation, it could actually mean better economic outcomes over the long run.


January 13, 2022

Thomas Garretson, CFA
Senior Portfolio Strategist
Fixed Income Strategies
Portfolio Advisory Group – U.S.

The big news of the week was, of course, inflation hitting seven percent on a year-over-year basis, according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the highest reading since 1982, and a level only seen as putting even more pressure on the Fed to act sooner rather than later.

And so naturally on a data point like that, stocks showed only a muted reaction, and Treasury yields dipped lower, while the dollar continues to weaken. In situations such as this, it’s pretty standard fare to simply chalk it up to markets having already priced in certain data and expectations, and then move on.

But in some ways that’s likely true in this case. Though current inflationary pressures continue unabated, the market’s expectations for inflation in the coming years have actually moderated of late. After peaking at 3.2 percent last year, markets are now looking for inflation to average closer to 2.8 percent over the next five years.

And we can chalk that up to the Fed as policymakers continued to pledge allegiance to lower inflation this week.

Fed up

Eonomists expect that the worst of the inflationary pressures are at least nearing an endpoint. Though inflation will likely continue to run north of seven percent on a year-over-year basis for the next couple of months, RBC Economics sees that pace slowing to 2.8 percent by the end of the year.

Will modest rate hikes be enough to tame inflation?

markets catchup chart 1

Consumer Price Index (y/y)

Fed funds rate

Dashed lines indicate RBC Economics forecasts as of December 2021

Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg, RBC Economics

Part of that comes from expectations around more aggressive Fed action this year to tame inflation. Markets are now fully priced for three rate hikes by December, beginning at the Fed’s March policy meeting, with a 50 percent chance the Fed ends up delivering four, based on current market pricing. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, who votes on policy this year and had forecast three rate hikes at the December meeting, already now sees a case for four, stating that: “If we get a couple of rate-hike moves under our belt during the first part of this year then we’ll be in better shape.”

Admittedly, three rate hikes this year to a policy rate range of 0.75 percent to 1.00 percent looks rather quaint against headline inflation running north of seven percent. But we believe that should be sufficient to at least start reining in the demand side of the demand-supply imbalance that continues to be the primary force behind inflation.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated this week that: “In a way, high inflation is a severe threat to the achievement of maximum employment. We think wages moving up is generally a good thing, but if you look back through history, there are times when wages have moved up in a way that has fostered persistent inflation, and that hurts everyone.”

And perhaps that perfectly sums up and explains the market action to start the year: we envision a scenario where the Fed raises rates, but only to a certain point, before pausing as inflation cools, allowing for continued expansion and a full recovery of the labor market, particularly on the labor force participation front. If the Fed can achieve that, it’s a net-positive for markets and the economy, and why markets may now be looking through current inflation numbers.

2022: A year of shifting gears

Click here to listen to a discussion of why the economy is positioned for above-trend growth and why equities should post positive returns, albeit with more volatility.

So goes January, so goes the year?

Given the sharp repricing of Fed rate hike expectations of late, the bond market is now off to one of its worst starts to a year since 2009, with the benchmark Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index down 1.5 percent through Jan. 12. And this follows 2021, which was already a rare down year for U.S. bond markets. There have only been four such instances of negative calendar-year returns, and never has the market delivered investors back-to-back declines since the inception of this index.

What’s in store for bond markets after a rare down year in 2021?

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index annual total returns since inception

markets catchup chart 2

Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg

Will that streak come to an end in 2022? It’s certainly possible given that yields remain historically low, but after the jump in yields so far this year, we think further gains will be more moderate, and that bond market returns in 2022 will likely be flat.

For context, bond prices decline as yields rise, so for investors the question becomes whether the price decline is greater than the coupon earned in any given year. So, with all of the concern around rising rates and higher Treasury yields, what might returns actually look like?

The benchmark 10-year Treasury currently yields approximately 1.73 percent. If purchased today, the yield would have to rise to 1.94 percent for the price decline to wipe out the coupon earned for the year; should the yield rise to 2.20 percent by the end of 2022, as RBC Capital Markets currently forecasts, the total return would be negative 2.2 percent. But what if yields were to decline? A slip back to just 1.50 percent would actually generate a solid 3.60 percent return for the year.

The outlook for shorter-dated Treasuries looks slightly better, in our view. Should the 2-year yield rise to 1.35 percent from 0.90 percent currently, as RBC Capital Markets expects, returns would still be positive at 0.44 percent.

But for buy-and-hold investors, all of this may be a moot point, given that returns in any given year are largely inconsequential. But for those reasons, we maintain a slightly negative outlook for Treasuries, and a positive outlook for corporate bonds and preferred shares. However, and importantly, we do expect that over the course of 2022 that bias could shift back in favor of Treasuries should the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield move north of 2.0 percent.

As always, though the return outlook for bonds may be bleak based on current forecasts, they will continue to add ballast and stability for portfolios should volatility persist in 2022.

This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC ® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.

The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.

This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.

Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. The Channel Island subsidiaries are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme; the offices of Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Guernsey and Jersey are covered by the respective compensation schemes in these jurisdictions for deposit taking business only.

Thomas Garretson, CFA

Senior Portfolio Strategist
Fixed Income Strategies
Portfolio Advisory Group – U.S.

Related articles

Life after sports requires a new game plan

Analysis 5 minute read
- Life after sports requires a new game plan

Adapt or risk losing the next generation of HNWIs

Analysis 4 minute read
- Adapt or risk losing the next generation of HNWIs

How long will the economic recovery take?

Analysis 5 minute read
- How long will the economic recovery take?