January 6, 2022

Kelly Bogdanova
Vice President, Portfolio Analyst
Portfolio Advisory Group – U.S.

The U.S. equity market outperformed international markets once again in 2021, and this time by a wide margin.

The S&P 500 sprinted higher by 26.9 percent for the year, not including dividends, while broad European and international indexes rose by 14.1 percent and 10.1 percent in dollar terms, respectively, and emerging markets and Asia outright declined.

The U.S. equity market outperformed significantly

Price performance of major global indexes in 2021

Chart - RBC Wealth Management market performance

S&P 500

MSCI Europe

MSCI World ex-U.S.

MSCI Emerging Markets

MSCI Asia ex-Japan

Source - RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg; all data priced in U.S. dollars and through 12/31/21

Last year, the S&P 500 benefited from its higher representation of growth stocks, including technology-oriented stocks in various sectors, compared to many indexes outside of the U.S.

When growth stocks began to outperform value in the spring of 2021, and then continued to rack up more gains, the U.S. market charged ahead of international markets.

Allocations askew?

The outperformance of U.S. large-capitalization stocks is actually nothing new. The S&P 500 has put together a multiyear winning streak that began in 2011, when measured by five-year rolling returns, a standard methodology for evaluating long-term market and individual stock trends.

Such a multiyear move can throw portfolio allocations out-of-whack if left unattended. It naturally has the effect of boosting the allocation to U.S. equities at the expense of international. This can lead to a “U.S. bias” in portfolios—not just for American investors (here, we refer to this as a portfolio having a “home bias”), but also for investors in other regions who have allocations to U.S. equities.

As S&P 500 gains have piled on year after year and were further stoked in 2021, U.S. allocations may have become larger than intended.

Benefits of an international mindset

Historical data signal that U.S. equity market dominance won’t last forever.

Since 1975, U.S. versus international performance trends have moved in bunches. Both groups jockeyed back and forth with the U.S. outperforming for a number of years, and then international stocks took the mantle and led the way. During this time, the U.S. recorded three dominant periods of outperformance and international stocks also enjoyed three instances of ascendance, all of which had varying magnitudes and durations.

U.S. and international markets tend to move in multiyear cycles

Relative performance of U.S. S&P 500 versus international developed markets based on five-year rolling returns*

Chart - RBC Wealth Management U.S and international market performance

Above zero, the U.S. market outperformed;
below zero, international markets outperformed

*Relative performance represents the S&P 500 Index’s returns minus international developed markets’ returns (MSCI World ex-U.S.).

Source - RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg; monthly data from 1/31/75 – 12/31/21

While there is no bell that will ring when the performance shifts from U.S. back to international stocks again—and it’s a fruitless exercise to attempt to precisely time the move—we think international stocks have favorable characteristics that argue for their inclusion in portfolios at least at a level near the long-term strategic recommended allocation:

  • Importantly, the valuation disparity between the two groups is much wider than usual. The large-cap S&P 500’s price-to-earnings ratio is high and expensive. It trades at 21.4x the 2022 consensus earnings estimate compared to a 10-year average of 17.9x and an average of 17.5x since 1990. Various developed and emerging international markets appear more attractively valued, either trading near or below their 10-year averages.

The U.S. market’s valuation is above average whereas other markets are near or below average

Forward price-to-earnings ratios based on 2022 consensus forecasts vs. the 10-year average

Chart - RBC Wealth Management market's valuations
10-year average

Note: MSCI World ex-U.S. represents developed markets excluding the U.S.

Source - RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg; data as of 1/5/22

  • International indexes tend to provide more exposure to value stocks, which currently have more inexpensive valuations than usual compared to growth segments of the global equity market.
  • RBC Capital Markets sees evidence that U.S. stocks are “over-owned” compared to those in other regions—meaning, many portfolio managers around the world are holding a higher share of U.S. stocks than they normally do.
  • U.S. profit margins seem more stretched and more vulnerable to declining than margins of international indexes, in our view.
  • Developed markets outside of the U.S. have higher dividend yields: 2.59 percent for the MSCI World ex-U.S. compared to 1.29 percent for the S&P 500.

While we anticipate positive returns for the S&P 500 in 2022, and we would continue to moderately Overweight U.S. equities to start the year, at this stage, we do not recommend significantly overweighting U.S. exposure at the expense of international equities.

Now is a good time to review portfolio allocations and adjust them if needed. This can help ensure that there isn’t too much of a bias toward U.S. equities and that for diversification purposes international stocks are represented at a level at least near the long-term strategic recommended allocation in global portfolios.

This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC ® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.

The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.

This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.

Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. The Channel Island subsidiaries are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme; the offices of Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Guernsey and Jersey are covered by the respective compensation schemes in these jurisdictions for deposit taking business only.

Kelly Bogdanova

Vice President, Portfolio Analyst
Portfolio Advisory Group – U.S.