The rollout of the Sustainability Disclosure Requirements aims to increase the transparency of sustainable investments and combat greenwashing.
Sustainable investing has had a rough ride in recent years. While many individuals want to make a difference to the environment and society through their investments, the risk of “greenwashing” of sustainable investments has posed a major concern. Indeed, it has been difficult for many investors to know and identify what a sustainable investment really is.
Greenwashing is the act of making false or potentially misleading statements about the sustainability or environmental credentials of a product. In the context of funds, this can manifest itself in a multitude of ways and distract from and delay credible action.
“We often see inappropriate use of data,” explains Stephen Metcalf, head of Sustainable Investing at RBC Wealth Management in the British Isles and Asia. “Claims, for instance, that a fund has taken ‘x’ number of cars off the road. Whereas in reality the companies in that fund have just reduced their carbon emissions, and the fund then uses a loosely worded impact metaphor to market itself.”
Likewise, excessive use of buzzwords is typically a red flag, as is the use of imagery such as trees that have no substantial or meaningful link to the investment or fund in question.
“There are funds that claim they use ESG integration and pass that off as a sustainability objective,” explains Tom Blathwayt, director of ESG at RBC Europe. “In truth, however, ESG integration should probably be a bare minimum on top of which you can build a sustainability objective.”
The need for clarity is clear, with concerns about greenwashing very much at the forefront of investors’ minds. The Association of Investment Companies’ ESG Attitudes Tracker noted that 63 percent of those surveyed in 2023 agreed with the statement “I’m not convinced by ESG statements from funds.”
So, what is deemed a sustainable investment and how can investors trust the claims that are made?
Sustainable investing is defined as investing with the stated intention of achieving positive sustainability outcomes (i.e. with a sustainability objective). And the Financial Conduct Authority’s Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) regime, implemented in 2024, is helping consumers navigate the market for sustainable investment products.
Its first phase introduced the anti-greenwashing rule for all FCA-authorised firms. The rule states that firms need to ensure their sustainability references are fair, clear and not misleading, and are proportionate to the sustainability profile of the product and services.
“With the new rule, firms can’t just highlight positive sustainability impacts,” says Blathwayt. “If a statement refers to a small component of a fund or a small part of a business, this has to be clarified. Claims have to be clear and balanced. That is one of the big changes going forward.”
From 31 July 2024, the second phase of SDR applies, with the introduction of the fund labelling regime. These labels are intended to help investors understand the sustainability objectives of any given fund, and they fall into four categories*:
*Each labelled product may invest in other assets for liquidity and risk management purposes, so long as 70 percent of the gross value of the product’s assets are invested in line with the sustainability objective.
Funds with these labels will need to provide investors with clear and simple information, including what the sustainability goal is, the approach to achieving it and annual updates on progress towards the goal.
“I know the FCA did a lot of work with investors, and I think these labels certainly align well with investor expectations,” says Metcalf. “I think it really makes a clear distinction between something which inadvertently may have sustainability characteristics versus something where there is a clear sustainability objective to invest.”
The third important SDR date is 2 Dec. 2024, which is the date by which firms must make necessary changes to meet naming and marketing requirements.
Only funds with the aforementioned labels can use “sustainable,” “sustainability” and “impact” in their names – with the latter usable only by funds with the “Sustainability Impact” label, subject to strict criteria and disclosure standards.
Non-labelled products that use ESG-related terms in their name or marketing must follow the same disclosure standards as funds with a label, as well as provide a statement to clarify why the product doesn’t have a label.
“There are still some questions about how SDR will play out in practice,” says Blathwayt. “But it’s such a big step forward, because now we have standardised categories of sustainability outcomes and clarity on how funds can meet these outcomes. These are crucial to help us meet the needs of our clients.”
On the surface, the introduction of the SDR should provide clarity that has been missing around sustainable investing, and investors may see the names of some of their funds change in the coming year. RBC’s Responsible and Sustainability Investment Framework is consistent with the anti-greenwashing rule and aligned with the SDR labelling regime.
At the heart of RBC Wealth Management’s framework, and investment approach, is a distinction between a “core” responsible investment approach, which applies to all direct equities and funds covered by the firm’s central research team, and an “additional” sustainability investment approach for investors with exposure to funds and products with a sustainability objective. RBC’s process for assessing sustainability preferences will evolve to align with this.
“The core approach is what all discretionary investors receive as a minimum, with the goal to meet a client’s investment objective, namely, maximise investment returns for a given level of risk,” says Metcalf.
RBC Wealth Management employs an ESG-integration approach in investment decision-making. Depending on a client’s preferences and their profile, RBC Wealth Management can also exclude specific sectors, screen funds or companies based on ESG factors, and use thematic investments. The core responsible investment products may have sustainability characteristics but not sustainability objectives. For example, an investor may feel strongly about not investing in a company associated with animal testing, but doesn’t have a need for a broader sustainability objective.
“Additional” investments are for clients with extra sustainability-related preferences or requirements, such as wanting to drive positive environmental change. These investments will have a sustainability objective, as per the SDR regulations. These products are labelled under the regime and must meet specific criteria.
The confusion around greenwashing has created a measure of uncertainty among investors. Indeed, in a RBC Wealth Management survey of UK clients, 45 percent of respondents stated they still require further education in the sustainability space.
“There is going to be more transparency, so investors will be able to get under the skin of funds and get a better sense of their sustainability objectives,” says Blathwayt. “And I would certainly recommend that. Be curious and ask questions, especially if something isn’t clear.”
“Look out for overhyped language or dubious claims in marketing material,” says Metcalf. “Check if a fund is using a label and find out what its goals are and how it intends to achieve them. And if in doubt, speak to your trusted advisor who will be able to conduct their own due diligence.”
We want to talk about your financial future.
This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.
The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.
This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.
Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. Deposits made with Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Jersey are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website www.gov.je/dcs or on request.