With the Fed poised to lower overnight interest rates next week, we think investors may be disappointed with what lowering rates is likely to accomplish. We look at the potential asset-class implications if the Fed moves too aggressively.
September 11, 2025
By Atul Bhatia, CFA
If all goes as many expect next week, the Fed will kick off a monetary easing cycle that will lead to overnight borrowing costs just below three percent by the end of 2026, according to interest rate futures.
Although the press often presents it as a momentous decision, whether the Fed cuts in September, October, or December is trivial in the long run, in our view. We feel quite confident the U.S. economy will not collapse if rates are held constant next week, nor will a rate cut usher in a golden age of prosperity. We think most investors realise that in an economy as dynamic and robust as the U.S., a few basis points for a few months likely amount to noise.
Rather than timing, we think the real question is how the Fed is supposed to fix the suite of economic issues confronting the U.S. when all it has is a hammer and there is scarcely a nail in sight.
Let’s start with labour markets, the oft-cited reason the central bank needs to cut. We think it’s clear that labour demand has fallen dramatically over the past three months. That’s as evident in nonfarm payroll numbers as it is in private data sources such as the ADP and Institute for Supply Management employment surveys.
But even as hiring slows, it’s not clear to us how much lower overnight interest rates would help. Traditionally, rate cuts work by stimulating economic activity spurring companies to hire. One of the most important channels to spur growth is cash-out mortgage refinancing, but with nearly 60 percent of borrowers sitting with mortgages below five percent, that avenue is likely choked off for the foreseeable future.
More broadly, the fall in labour demand is occurring as economic growth continues at a brisk pace. U.S. GDP increased 3.3 percent on an annualised basis in Q2 2025. If that’s not sufficient to promote hiring, what level of growth would be required, and how could it be achieved in a non-inflationary way? With unit labour costs in the second quarter up 2.5 percent year over year, it’s hard to see how the Fed can spur growth and hiring without pushing the U.S. uncomfortably close to wage-driven price inflation.
Rather than a general lack of economic activity, we think the key labour market drivers are technological change and a mismatch between corporate hiring needs and the existing labour pool’s skills. Those long-term issues are unlikely to be fixed by the Fed easing overnight borrowing rates.
Even if labour markets are a weak justification, Fed accommodation could be useful if other areas of the economy are suffering from restrictive policy. Looking around, however, we struggle to find signs of that:
The bottom line here is that even if monetary policy is, in the abstract, a bit restrictive, in the real world, it’s simply not.
For us, the explanation is found in loose fiscal policy.
One can argue about the exact conversion rate between budget deficit growth and policy rate cuts, but we think there’s a solid case to be made that the current U.S. budget deficit is equivalent to between three and five rate cuts. The net result is that in the context of current fiscal policy, monetary policy looks close to appropriate and far from excessively restrictive.
“No harm, no foul” doesn’t appear in economic texts, but it’s a valid principle in the real world. Even if rate cuts won’t do much, if they don’t bring any negatives, why not give them a shot?
Dollar devaluation is one likely result we see from an unnecessarily aggressive Fed rate-cut cycle. The greenback is already down 10 percent versus major counterparts this year, and we would expect rate cuts to provide additional headwinds.
Whether a devaluation is a feature or a bug is largely a function of perspective. For those who hold equities, real estate, and precious metals, there probably isn’t a large downside from excessively cheap money. These assets can act as a hedge against inflation and tend to benefit as the dollar weakens. Borrowers also tend to benefit from a low-rate, cheap-dollar environment, a point that is probably not lost on the U.S. Treasury, the world’s largest borrower.
The people paying for the party are creditors. Not only will they have reduced purchasing power for foreign goods, but devaluation will likely have a meaningful negative impact on relative portfolio performance. Folks who are holding bonds to make a downpayment on a home, for instance, will likely find their homebuying power appreciably diminished if the dollar’s value continues to erode.
The Fed can and – we believe – should play an important role in defending the interests of long-term creditors, which include both price and currency stability. In our view, an aggressive rate cut policy likely undermines those interests and could make it more difficult for the U.S. to sell long-term bonds at attractive prices in the future.
We think a Fed cut next week is best framed as a missed opportunity. Rather than provide potentially ephemeral gains by adding monetary fuel to a deficit fire, we would prefer the central bank send a strong message to markets globally that there is an institutional player concerned with creditor outcomes and the value of long-term U.S. government securities. Unfortunately, our wait for such a signal looks likely to continue.
We want to talk about your financial future.
This publication has been issued by RBC’s Wealth Management international division in the United Kingdom and the Channel Islands which is comprised of an international network of RBC® companies located in these jurisdictions and includes RBC Europe Limited and Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by RBC’s Wealth Management international division.
This publication has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgements as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, the value of investments and income arising can go down, future returns are not guaranteed, and an investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products and services which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities or services discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.
This material is prepared for general circulation and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law none of the entities which comprise the international division of RBC Wealth Management nor any of their affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of RBC Wealth Management.
Clients of RBC Europe Limited may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) if it cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. For further information about the compensation provided by the FSCS scheme (including the amounts covered and eligibility to claim) please refer to the FSCS website FSCS.org.uk. Please note only compensation related queries should be directed to the FSCS. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
RBC Europe Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 995939. Its registered office is 100 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 4AA. RBC Europe Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited (“the Bank”) is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of deposit taking, fund services and investment business in Jersey. The Bank’s general terms and conditions are updated from time to time and can be found at https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-eu/terms-and-conditions. Registered office: Gaspé House, 66-72 Esplanade, St. Helier, Jersey JE2 3QT, Channel Islands. Deposits made with Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Jersey are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website http://www.gov.je/dcs or on request.
Investment services offered by the Bank are not covered by an investor compensation scheme as there is currently no such scheme operating in Jersey, however ‘eligible deposits’ held pursuant to investment services may be protected under the Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme described above – for more information see the Bank’s general terms and conditions. Some of the products that the Bank might recommend to you could be registered overseas and may be covered by a local compensation scheme. Your investment counsellor will provide you with the details of any overseas compensation schemes (where applicable) at the time of making an investment recommendation.
Copies of the latest audited accounts are available upon request from the registered office. ® / ™ Trademark(s) of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under licence.