Markets head lower following a hawkish rate cut by the U.S. Federal Reserve. We discuss the reasons behind the Fed’s shift and if investors really need to fear higher rates caused by stronger growth.
December 19, 2024
By Atul Bhatia, CFA
The Fed’s decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points (bps) on Dec. 18 was hardly a surprise. The move was predicted by almost 90 percent of economists surveyed by Bloomberg and was fully consistent with interest rate futures pricing ahead of the decision.
Slightly more noteworthy, in our view, were the changes to the central bank’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) – known colloquially as the “dot plot.” These showed policymakers shifting their projections higher for year-end 2025 GDP growth, inflation, and policy rates. Notably, policymakers now see only two 25 bps cuts in 2025, putting the median projection for the year-end federal funds rate 50 bps higher than it was at the September policy meeting.
But what really got markets to take notice was the hawkish tone to Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks, where he said that it would take further progress on inflation to justify additional rate cuts. Following his comments, U.S. Treasury bond yields rose between eight and 15 bps, depending on maturity, while the S&P 500 fell nearly three percent.
Despite this initial selling pressure following the Fed announcements, we believe a rate-cut pause is both warranted and salutary, and investors should focus on the economic strength driving the policy shifts.
Since before this rate-cut cycle began in September, Powell has claimed the central bank’s moves were “data dependent.” Likely true, but only technically so from our vantage point. Since July, we think rate cuts were largely pre-determined. An outlier reading could have kept rates unchanged, but for all practical purposes, data dependency was purely theoretical.
Based on the Fed’s most recent comments, however, our sense is that the central bank is now shifting into a more natural reading of “data dependency,” where it comes at the decision with a neutral bias, and it will only move if the data justifies it.
Source – RBC Wealth Management, U.S. Federal Reserve
And as we look at the numbers, we think a pause is clearly warranted.
The Fed’s job is to maximise employment consistent with stable prices. How is it doing? Well, it’s hard to argue there’s an employment problem. The benchmark unemployment rate is nearly one percent below its long-term median, and the broadest measure of labour weakness – which captures discouraged and underemployed workers – looks even stronger; it’s 1.6 percent below the long-term median. These measures have drifted slightly higher, but it’s undeniable that employment is stronger now than it was during prior economic expansions, let alone recessions.
The line chart shows the U.S. U-6 unemployment rate, the broadest measure of labour availability, with its median of 9.4% for the past 30 years. The U-6 rate was around 6.8% in December 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, and then spiked to nearly 23% in April 2020 before falling rapidly back to 6.5% in December 2022. The rate has risen gradually since then, and is now roughly 7.8%.
The U-6 unemployment rate includes the total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labour force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons.
Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg; monthly data through 11/30/24
Inflation – and not job creation – is arguably where the Fed should be focused, a stance that Powell’s press conference seemed to finally acknowledge. The core components of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which excludes food and energy, are up over three percent year-over-year and prices on the broad basket of goods have been rising at an accelerating monthly pace. The Fed’s two percent inflation target is technically based on a different measure of consumer prices, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE), that was up 2.3 percent year-over-year in October, the last available reading.
Normally, it would be reasonable to say that being within 0.3 percent of the inflation target is close enough. But this is not a normal inflation environment. We’re coming off a bout of near-double-digit inflation and it has left its mark on the U.S. economy. Even as annual inflation levels have moderated, market indicators of longer-term inflation expectations have remained above pre-pandemic levels. Expectations on price moves tend to be self-fulfilling; typically, businesses that expect higher supply costs are quick to raise prices and workers who think costs are going up are more aggressive in looking for wage gains.
Against that backdrop, Powell’s emphasis on inflation progress as a prerequisite for further cuts is reasonable, in our view. A contrary stance could risk losing control of the inflation narrative.
Although the S&P 500 sold off following the hawkish tone to Powell’s press conference, we think it’s a mistake to conclude that equity prices depend on lower interest rates.
For support, we need to look no further than the market’s response since the Fed initiated its rate-cut cycle in September. Back then, investors were pricing in 2.5 percent of policy easing; today, that number is closer to 1.4 percent. Despite that shift toward higher future interest rates, and even with yesterday’s selling, the S&P 500 gained five percent since the Fed’s meeting in September. With monetary policy being driven by economic strength, we see nothing inconsistent with higher rates and higher stock prices.
We think the bond market is telling a similar story. Going into the Fed’s September meeting, 10-year government bond yields were roughly 1.25 percent below three-month rates. As of Dec. 18, those rates are now essentially the same.
This type of relative move – referred to as curve steepening – can be a worrying sign when it’s driven by the Fed aggressively cutting short-term interest rates to stimulate a slowing economy. That’s not the case today, when the bulk of the steepening has come from rising long-term yields. That type of move is more consistent with a market pricing in solid economic growth and inflation risks than one that is concerned with an incipient recession.
Putting it all together, we think a pause in rate cuts is clearly warranted. After that, policy should – and likely will – boil down to how prices and labour markets are performing. While current indicators are generally positive and could be consistent with little or no additional policy easing, future developments could warrant more aggressive rate cuts than the Fed currently projects.
The most obvious path we see for further easing is slowing inflation and rising unemployment, possibly from global economic softening reaching the U.S. Politics is also a potential factor. There is a growing probability of a U.S. government shutdown, for instance. In addition, the incoming Trump administration has indicated a wide-ranging set of measures that could create unanticipated, negative short-term economic consequences.
All in all, we think investors need to focus not only on what the Fed is doing, but why. And a shift toward slower interest rate cuts based on robust domestic economic performance is nothing to be feared.
We want to talk about your financial future.
This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.
The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.
This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.
Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. Deposits made with Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Jersey are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website www.gov.je/dcs or on request.