Over the past decade, the S&P 500, which has historically been viewed as a balanced cross-section of the U.S. economy, has slowly transformed into a tech- and AI-dominated index. We believe this “Great Narrowing” should be top of mind for investors.
January 22, 2026
By Tyler Frawley, CFA
In 1990, the S&P 500 looked like a far more representative cross-section of the U.S. economy. The 10 largest companies by market cap (including IBM, Exxon, General Electric and Philip Morris) made up roughly 19 percent of the index. Leadership was spread across multiple sectors, and no single industry dominated overall returns.
That began to change during the late-1990s technology boom. By the end of 2000, the top 10 accounted for roughly 23 percent of the index (with concentration peaking during the year at about 27 percent), driven by the rise of companies such as Cisco, Microsoft and Intel. The subsequent unwind was sharp, and the early-2000s reset led to a period where concentration declined as energy and consumer stocks regained prominence.
A more durable shift began after the 2008 financial crisis with the rise of the platform economy, defined by software, cloud computing and digital advertising, which created business models capable of scaling with minimal marginal cost. Even then, concentration remained relatively modest for a time. By the end of 2015, the top 10 stocks accounted for about 19 percent of the S&P 500’s weight and roughly 19 percent of total index earnings, suggesting to us that market value and fundamentals were broadly aligned.
That balance has changed meaningfully over the past decade. By the end of 2025, the 10 largest companies accounted for nearly 41 percent of the S&P 500’s total weight, more than doubling in just 10 years.
Source – RBC Wealth Management, FactSet; data as of 12/31/25 and reflects year-end weighting for each year
The chart displays the cumulative weighting of the top 10 S&P 500 companies by year from 1990 to 2025, illustrating a general trend of increasing market concentration that has recently surged to historic levels. The top 10 weighting hovered stably around 18%–23% between 1990 and 2015 but has since nearly doubled in just one decade to a record 40.7% in 2025, driven largely by megacap technology and AI-related stocks.
The effects of rising concentration are most visible when comparing the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 to the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, which assigns each constituent an equal (about 0.2 percent) allocation.
From 2003 through 2022, the equal-weighted index actually outperformed the cap-weighted index by roughly 1.5 percent per year, reflecting size effects and periodic mean reversion among large-cap leaders.
However, this relationship has broken down meaningfully since the beginning of 2023, and over the past three years the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 has outperformed its equal-weighted counterpart by roughly 32 percent. This represents one of the largest three-year relative outperformances on record, exceeding the approximately 31 percent outperformance observed in the late 1990s and early 2000s in the run-up to the tech bubble.
The outperformance has coincided with a dramatic widening of the valuation gap, as the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 now trades at a nearly 30 percent premium to its equal-weighted counterpart, up from approximately 13 percent just prior to the pandemic, and sharply higher than the near-parity levels seen a decade ago.
This reflects, in part, how index concentration has risen significantly faster than earnings contribution. In 2025, the top 10 stocks represented roughly 41 percent of the index’s total weight but were expected to generate only about 32 percent of its earnings. That gap has widened meaningfully since 2015, when weight and earnings contribution were more closely aligned. While the largest companies remain highly profitable, market value concentration has increasingly run ahead of fundamental profitability.
Source – RBC Wealth Management, FactSet; data as of 12/31/25, monthly price return data
The chart illustrates the rolling 3-year relative performance of the S&P 500 versus its equal weight version from 1993 to the end of 2025. It begins with relatively flat performance in the early 1990s before the market-cap-weighted index surged during the tech bubble, peaking with a 31% relative outperformance in early 2000. This trend rapidly reversed as the bubble burst, leading to a period where the equal weight index significantly outperformed the market-cap-weighted index, which dipped to -33% 3-year relative performance by 2003. The relationship remained relatively stable for years until 2023, when market-cap weighting again dramatically took the lead, culminating in a record high relative performance peak of over 32% at the end of 2025.
It is important to acknowledge that today’s concentration is not purely speculative and, unlike prior market peaks, the largest constituents of the S&P 500 are highly profitable businesses with strong balance sheets, durable competitive advantages and substantial free cash-flow generation. Many are returning capital to shareholders while continuing to invest heavily in growth, particularly in AI-related products and infrastructure.
Elevated concentration alone is not sufficient evidence of a bubble. Market leadership has narrowed in part because earnings, margins and cash flow have narrowed. That distinction matters and helps explain why valuations have been elevated for longer than many investors anticipated.
Even so, we believe the current structure introduces several risks worth monitoring.
First, idiosyncratic shock risk is materially higher. In 1990, an earnings miss at a top holding would have had a limited index-level impact. Today, with NVIDIA alone representing nearly eight percent of the index, a single company can meaningfully influence index returns, affecting portfolios that assume broad diversification.
Second, there is the passive concentration trap. Many investors believe an S&P 500 fund offers wide diversification. But, more than $40 of every $100 invested flows into just 10 companies, creating a feedback loop where passive inflows disproportionately support the largest stocks, increasing their weights and reinforcing performance leadership regardless of fundamentals.
Third, correlation risk tied to AI exposure has increased. Unlike past periods when the top 10 spanned unrelated industries, today’s leaders are closely linked by a common theme – AI. That effectively turns the index into a directional bet on AI adoption and monetisation. If expectations slip or timelines extend, there are fewer offsetting exposures within the index to absorb the impact.
The “Great Narrowing” of the S&P 500 reflects a structural shift, where a handful of technology and AI-driven giants now dominate the index’s composition, performance and risk profile. While current leaders boast robust fundamentals, strong profitability, competitive advantages and growth trajectories, the sheer concentration of market value in a narrow cohort introduces new risk. The disconnect between weight and earnings contribution, outsized influence of individual stocks and passive inflows amplifying this dynamic underscore a critical reality – what appears as broad diversification increasingly functions as a concentrated allocation in a single thematic outcome.
For investors, this evolution requires a recalibration of assumptions. The index has been a resilient benchmark, but its top-heavy structure warrants scrutiny. Understanding embedded risks, from idiosyncratic volatility to thematic correlation, is more essential than ever, in our view.
We want to talk about your financial future.
This publication has been issued by RBC’s Wealth Management international division in the United Kingdom and the Channel Islands which is comprised of an international network of RBC® companies located in these jurisdictions and includes RBC Europe Limited and Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by RBC’s Wealth Management international division.
This publication has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgements as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, the value of investments and income arising can go down, future returns are not guaranteed, and an investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products and services which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities or services discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.
This material is prepared for general circulation and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law none of the entities which comprise the international division of RBC Wealth Management nor any of their affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of RBC Wealth Management.
Clients of RBC Europe Limited may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) if it cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. For further information about the compensation provided by the FSCS scheme (including the amounts covered and eligibility to claim) please refer to the FSCS website FSCS.org.uk. Please note only compensation related queries should be directed to the FSCS. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
RBC Europe Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 995939. Its registered office is 100 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 4AA. RBC Europe Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited (“the Bank”) is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of deposit taking, fund services and investment business in Jersey. The Bank’s general terms and conditions are updated from time to time and can be found at https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-eu/terms-and-conditions. Registered office: Gaspé House, 66-72 Esplanade, St. Helier, Jersey JE2 3QT, Channel Islands. Deposits made with Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Jersey are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website http://www.gov.je/dcs or on request.
Investment services offered by the Bank are not covered by an investor compensation scheme as there is currently no such scheme operating in Jersey, however ‘eligible deposits’ held pursuant to investment services may be protected under the Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme described above – for more information see the Bank’s general terms and conditions. Some of the products that the Bank might recommend to you could be registered overseas and may be covered by a local compensation scheme. Your investment counsellor will provide you with the details of any overseas compensation schemes (where applicable) at the time of making an investment recommendation.
Copies of the latest audited accounts are available upon request from the registered office. ® / ™ Trademark(s) of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under licence.