U.S. employment report: U.S. labour market continues to weather shocks

Analysis
Insights

Manufacturing and warehousing rebound in March as the unemployment rate points to a stable labour market beneath payroll volatility.

Share

April 3, 2026

By Mike Reid, Carrie Freestone and Imri Haggin

Bottom line

The March employment report surprised to the upside as payrolls added +178k and the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.3%. But in the shadow of a weak February (revised down to -133k), the March gain should not be taken at face value. Still, we view the unemployment rate as the better barometer of labour market health and the improvement there shows that the labour market remains on stable footings despite the volatility in payroll growth.

In fact, much of the volatility should be expected – between SCOTUS overturning IEEPA and the escalation in the Middle East conflict driving oil prices higher, different sectors of the economy will need to react in different ways. The surprise came from sectors that have been most impacted by trade disruptions: manufacturing as well as transportation and warehousing both added jobs in March. Those sectors have largely shed jobs since Liberation Day as uncertain trade policies weighed on hiring. The underlying themes held steady in March as healthcare remains the largest contributor to job growth (even when correcting for the nurses’ strike that ended).

Construction hiring rebounded after a particularly cold February, driven largely by nonresidential construction (largely a data centre story). So too did leisure and hospitality and retail sales, both reflective of a U.S. consumer that continues to spend despite the uncertainty ahead. The most important takeaway from this report should be an appreciation for how low the breakeven rate of payroll growth has fallen (i.e., the number of job gains needed to keep the unemployment rate steady). Even though the labour market has averaged only 15k jobs per month since October, the unemployment rate fell from 4.5% to 4.3%. Importantly, this employment report gives the Fed more time to assess incoming inflation data, and we expect they will remain on pause as their dual mandate faces growing tension.

Unemployment rate falling despite low job growth

Q1 hiring lifted the three-month average to 68k – markedly better than the 12-month trend

Q1 hiring lifted the three-month average to 68k – markedly better than the 12-month trend

Here’s what stood out to us in the report:

1. Unemployment rate fell to 4.3%, driven by fewer job losers and fewer re-entrants

  • The majority of the downshift in unemployment in the household survey can be attributed to fewer job losses in March. We also witnessed a decline in unemployed new entrants and re-entrants.
  • The unemployment rate fell not only for prime-age workers (aged 25 to 54) but also for those under 25 years of age (i.e., recent grads). This is a meaningful improvement in an economy where job search times have lengthened.
  • Concerningly, the U6 unemployment rate ticked up to 8.0% in March, partially reversing February’s improvement as the number of those working part-time for economic reasons increased slightly. This could be an early sign of stress resulting from the conflict in the Middle East.

2. A strong March non-farm payroll (NFP) print does not fully override months of minimal job gains

  • On net, the U.S. economy averaged few jobs over the past six months (+15K) with the majority of gains driven by the healthcare sector (+85K jobs gains on average over six months) offsetting declines in trade-exposed sectors (-5K over six months).
  • Goods sector hiring has been weak outside of construction and March was the first month that the trade-exposed manufacturing sector added a meaningful number of jobs since 2024.
  • Cyclical services sector hiring has, by and large, been negative on net suggesting that many firms are not backfilling positions that have been left vacant by retirees. The services sector employs a greater number of older workers (55+) versus the goods sector.

3. The U.S. labour market does not need to create many jobs at this juncture

  • Between February and March, the U.S. economy only added +45K jobs and yet the unemployment rate moved lower. This suggests an exceptionally low rate of break-even employment.
  • This is unsurprising given the massive wave of retirees as well as the low levels of immigration. Importantly as firms hire new workers, the “gains” are offset by retirees leaving payrolls, meaning job creation is limited. Still, this is largely why we have been seeing low job gains and a stable unemployment rate.
  • We continue to give more weight to the unemployment rate as a gauge of labour market health rather than looking exclusively at payroll data, where sector changes are reflective of policy uncertainty.  

Beneath the surface

  • Between February and March, the U.S. economy only added +45K jobs and yet the unemployment rate moved lower. This suggests an exceptionally low rate of breakeven employment.
  • This is unsurprising given the massive wave of retirees as well as the low levels of immigration. Importantly as firms hire new workers, the “gains” are offset by retirees leaving payrolls, meaning job creation is limited. Still, this is largely why we have been seeing low job gains and a stable unemployment rate.
  • We continue to give more weight to the unemployment rate as a gauge of labour market health rather than looking exclusively at payroll data, where sector changes are reflective of policy uncertainty.  

This article was originally published on RBC Economics .

About the authors:

Mike Reid is Head of U. Economics at RBC. He is responsible for generating RBC’s U.S. economic outlook, providing commentary on macro indicators and producing written analysis around the economic backdrop.

Carrie Freestone is a Senior U.S. Economist at RBC. Carrie is responsible for projecting key U.S. indicators including GDP, employment, consumer spending and inflation for the U.S. She also contributes to commentary surrounding the U.S. economic backdrop which she delivers to clients through publications, presentations and the media. 

Imri Haggin is a U.S. Economist at RBC, where he focuses on thematic research. His prior work has centred on consumer credit dynamics and treasury modelling, with an emphasis on leveraging data to understand behaviour.

Let’s connect


We want to talk about your financial future.


This publication has been issued by RBC’s Wealth Management international division in the United Kingdom and the Channel Islands which is comprised of an international network of RBC® companies located in these jurisdictions and includes RBC Europe Limited and Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by RBC’s Wealth Management international division.

This publication has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgements as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, the value of investments and income arising can go down, future returns are not guaranteed, and an investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products and services which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities or services discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.

This material is prepared for general circulation and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law none of the entities which comprise the international division of RBC Wealth Management nor any of their affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of RBC Wealth Management.

Clients of RBC Europe Limited may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) if it cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. For further information about the compensation provided by the FSCS scheme (including the amounts covered and eligibility to claim) please refer to the FSCS website FSCS.org.uk. Please note only compensation related queries should be directed to the FSCS. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

RBC Europe Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 995939. Its registered office is 100 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 4AA. RBC Europe Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.

Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited (“the Bank”) is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of deposit taking, fund services and investment business in Jersey. The Bank’s general terms and conditions are updated from time to time and can be found at https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-eu/terms-and-conditions. Registered office: Gaspé House, 66-72 Esplanade, St. Helier, Jersey JE2 3QT, Channel Islands. Deposits made with Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Jersey are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website http://www.gov.je/dcs or on request.

Investment services offered by the Bank are not covered by an investor compensation scheme as there is currently no such scheme operating in Jersey, however ‘eligible deposits’ held pursuant to investment services may be protected under the Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme described above – for more information see the Bank’s general terms and conditions. Some of the products that the Bank might recommend to you could be registered overseas and may be covered by a local compensation scheme. Your investment counsellor will provide you with the details of any overseas compensation schemes (where applicable) at the time of making an investment recommendation.

Copies of the latest audited accounts are available upon request from the registered office.
® / ™ Trademark(s) of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under licence.


Related articles

Coping mechanisms for equity market volatility

Analysis 6 minute read
- Coping mechanisms for equity market volatility

Iran war: De-escalating or escalating?

Analysis 8 minute read
- Iran war: De-escalating or escalating?

Then and now: Market reactions to military conflicts and what they mean today

Analysis 8 minute read
- Then and now: Market reactions to military conflicts and what they mean today