Weaving the threads of U.S. equity outperformance

Analysis
Insights

While AI and the Magnificent 7 have been exceedingly visible in their leadership, we spotlight two other trends with a clear impact on portfolio performance and how to approach U.S. equities as the economic environment inevitably evolves.

Share

July 11, 2024

By Ben Graham, CFA

The S&P 500 continues to surge in 2024 despite a myriad of concerns, and leadership remains narrow. The result is a bull market that many investors find unappealing, as the surge to record highs may appear unjustified from an economic perspective, or frustrating for portfolios that lack sufficient positions driving most of the market’s gains.

Beyond the market’s narrow focus, certain recognisable trends of outperformance persist in 2024. One of these threads is commonly associated with outperformance, while the other stylistically continues to be a force in the market.

Mind the yield signs, dividend yield that is

Low dividend yields continue to be highly correlated with outperformance, meaning that higher-yielding equities are underperforming lower-yielding ones.

Interestingly, as some of the mega-cap tech stocks graduate from the no-yield classification to the bucket with ultralow yields of one percent or less (recent dividend initiators include Meta Platforms and Alphabet), the no-yield bucket is one of the worst-performing segments, rising only 3.4 percent year to date, on average. The no-yield segment of the market has underperformed all other segments, on average, except for stocks with yields greater than three percent.

However, the average data doesn’t tell the full story. Many of the no-yielding stocks have actually performed quite well. When accounting for the upside/downside ratio of no-yield stocks, the return profile improves dramatically.

S&P 500 2024 returns by yield groupings

Low-yield dividend payers lead the market, while the highest-yielding equities are the worst segment.

Yield
0% < 1% < 2% < 3% > 3%
Average 3.4% 18.0% 5.2% 5.4% 0.9%
Best performer 215.1% 165.3% 56.2% 54.9% 31.4%
Worst performer -43.3% -18.1% -36.8% -32.6% -56.8%
High/Low Ratio 5.0x 9.2x 1.5x 1.7x 0.6x
Percent companies with returns > 0% 48.5% 75.6% 63.1% 59.1% 57.7%
Number of S&P 500 companies 99 82 103 88 130
S&P 500 total return YTD 17.8%

Source – RBC Wealth Management, FactSet; data through 7/9/24

Our study indicates that high dividend yield continues to be a critical factor in 2024 underperformance. Conversely, many no-yield stocks and the low-yield group as a whole are correlated with outperformance. For example, stocks with yields of less than one percent have rallied 18.0 percent year to date, on average, exceeding the S&P 500’s strong 17.8 percent return.

The reason this best-performing bucket is so close to the benchmark return is because the study takes an equal-weighted approach to the averages, and the cap-weighted nature of the S&P 500 means that the largest companies, which also happen to be some of the best performers, have an outsized impact on index-level returns.

Revision division

Another more consistent driver of outperformance over time is higher earnings estimate revisions.

This year, companies that have seen their 2024 consensus earnings estimate rise have outperformed those that have seen earnings per share (EPS) estimates fall.

When we segmented the change in EPS estimates into six categories from worst to best, we found that with each improvement in the EPS change bucket, average share price performance has climbed. For example, stocks with earnings estimates that declined more than 10 percent (the worst segment) fell 5.1 percent year to date, on average. But stocks with earnings estimates that rose more than 10 percent (the best segment) rose 26.6 percent on average.

Positive estimate revisions are one of the more traditional indicators of equity outperformance, which holds true in 2024 despite all the competing crosswinds present in the market.

By connecting the threads of dividend yield and earnings estimate revisions, it becomes clear to us that recent high-performing stocks in the S&P 500 typically show below-average dividend yields and above-average earnings estimate revisions.

The top 10 performing stocks in the S&P 500 in 2024 have returned 94.7 percent on average, significantly outperforming the S&P 500’s 17.8 percent gain. The average dividend yield of this outperforming group is 0.7 percent, roughly half that of the market, while the average 2024 estimate increase for this group is 17.0 percent, more than 7x higher than that of the market.

Context matters

To identify future investment opportunities, we think it helps to understand recent market movements because they can provide context for forward-looking decisions.

Currently, we are in a market characterised by narrow leadership, low-dividend outperformance, and a scenario where inflation is slowing and unemployment is still manageable. When these factors change, we believe the high-quality equities that have been underperforming will likely benefit.

Using the Dividend Aristocrats basket (S&P 500 companies that have increased their dividends in each of the past 25 consecutive years) as a proxy for underperforming, high-quality stocks, this basket of companies is mired in its worst multiyear performance stretch on record.

Over the past 20 years, 2023 was the worst year of underperformance for the Dividend Aristocrats compared to the S&P 500, as the table on the previous page shows. So far, 2024 is on pace to be the second-worst year. Furthermore, four of the five worst years of underperformance have occurred since 2019.

Aristocrats have underperformed the market in recent years

Dividend Aristocrat underperformance continues to trend near the lowest levels on record, with the three worst years on record coming since 2020.

Year Dividend Aristocrats1 S&P 5002 Difference Rank (1 = worst) 5Y cumulative difference
20243 1.1% 17.8% -16.7% 2 -44.8%
2023 8.4% 26.3% -17.8% 1 -29.0%
2022 -6.2% -18.1% 11.9% 21 3.0%
2021 26.0% 28.7% -2.7% 7 -25.9%
2020 8.7% 18.4% -9.7% 3 -18.9%
2019 28.0% 31.5% -3.5% 5 -2.8%
2018 -2.7% -4.4% 1.7% 16 4.4%
2017 21.7% 21.8% -0.1% 12 2.2%
2016 11.8% 12.0% -0.1% 10 3.9%
2015 0.9% 1.4% -0.5% 9 15.0%
2014 15.8% 13.7% 2.1% 17 26.4%
2013 32.3% 32.4% -0.1% 11 24.9%
2012 16.9% 16.0% 0.9% 14 40.9%
2011 8.3% 2.1% 6.2% 20 26.4%
2010 19.4% 15.1% 4.3% 18 23.6%
2009 26.6% 26.5% 0.1% 13 15.7%
2008 -21.9% -37.0% 15.1% 23 17.9%
2007 -2.1% 5.5% -7.6% 4 -10.4%
2006 17.3% 15.8% 1.5% 15 23.7%
2005 3.7% 4.9% -1.2% 8 47.2%
2004 15.5% 10.9% 4.6% 19 70.2%
Average 10.9% 11.5% -0.6%
Median 11.8% 15.1% -3.2%

Notes: (1) Dividend Aristocrats are companies that have grown their dividends in each of the past 25 years. (2) S&P 500 returns are total returns. (3) 2024 results are year-to-date through 7/9/24.

Source – RBC Wealth Management, FactSet

The result of these outcomes is a stretch of never-before-seen underperformance of the Dividend Aristocrats compared to the S&P 500.

Given the significant degree to which this investment style has been out of favour, the probability that high-quality stocks will outperform when the investment landscape changes is much better today than on average, in our view. Notably, the Dividend Aristocrats have historically delivered their strongest performance during and following economic slowdowns.

From our vantage point, the fundamental thesis for these high-quality equities is supported by attractive valuations compared to the broader market and business models that have historically weathered economic volatility better than the market at large.

While we are in a frustratingly narrow market, we think it is important for investors to stay disciplined and consistent by executing on their investment plan and identifying future opportunities. We believe high-quality dividend-paying stocks are in a favourable position for when the investment landscape changes again, as it is sure to do.


This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC ® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.

The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.

This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.

Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. The Channel Island subsidiary is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme; the office of Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website www.gov.je/dcs or on request.


Let’s connect


We want to talk about your financial future.

Related articles

U.S. debt dilemma: No quick fixes and no catastrophes

Analysis 14 minute read
- U.S. debt dilemma: No quick fixes and no catastrophes

Redder: Updating our recession scorecard

Analysis 4 minute read
- Redder: Updating our recession scorecard

Reading between the lines of the stock market rally

Analysis 6 minute read
- Reading between the lines of the stock market rally