Key themes have the potential to shape economic developments and drive certain sectors for decades to come.
December 2, 2025
Eric Lascelles Chief Economist
Somehow, the 21st century is now more than a quarter complete. Amazingly, we are already inhabiting the second quarter of the century – an era that will extend until the distant year of 2049.
Thinking over such long durations is valuable: a broad aperture is a better match for the average investor’s time horizon than the more frenetic year-to-year or even day-to-day analysis that usually prevails. Doing so helps to separate the wheat from the chaff: it is the macro themes that stick around for decades that arguably matter the most.
As a starting point, it is instructive to reflect on the key macro themes of the now-completed first quarter century. Even more so, if far more speculatively, it is useful to ponder the economic themes that could dominate the next quarter century.
Source – RBC Global Asset Management
The rise of China must surely figure centrally in the first quarter of this century. China was admitted to the World Trade Organization in 2001 and enjoyed a rocket-fuelled ride, taking over a large swath of global manufacturing and massively increasing its own standard of living along the way.
To a less prominent degree, the first quarter century also saw significant advancement across many emerging-market nations, to the point that these countries now generate over 60 percent of global economic output on a purchasing-power-parity basis (and around 40 percent on a market-exchange-rate basis).
Alongside this, globalization remained a powerful force for much of the quarter century, driving global growth, though it waned considerably over the final decade as Brexit and the introduction of U.S. tariffs marked a significant, late reversal.
It was a quarter century in which the tech sector dominated, with the internet blossoming and smartphones revolutionizing daily life.
Demographics were already souring at the beginning of the quarter century, but the ball really got rolling late in the first decade, and now a range of countries are experiencing outright shrinking populations.
Somewhat less glamorously, and with a number of shuddering speedbumps along the way, the Eurozone project went from its early stages – the European Central Bank was just a year old in 2000, and the physical euro was not introduced until 2002, expanding to 20 countries from 11, issuing common debt, devising bailout mechanisms, centralizing banking supervision – to now engaging in efforts to coordinate energy and military decision-making.
Households leveraged themselves significantly over the first part of the quarter century; at which point, the public sector broadly took over, borrowing extensively through the latter part of that stretch. The bottom line is that quite a lot of debt has accumulated.
There was a commodity supercycle, in significant part because of China’s rapid growth and ravenous appetite for raw materials.
Bond yields generally declined over the quarter century, except for a sharp upward tilt in the final few years.
The U.S. stock market performance over the quarter century – crucially defined in this case as Jan. 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2024 – was fairly pedestrian relative to earlier eras. If that seems surprisingly low, recall that it was a tale of two time periods, with a lost decade from 2000 to 2009 followed by pretty remarkable gains since then.
The column chart shows the total annualized return of the S&P 500 for 25-year periods. From 1875 through 1899 the return was 6.2%; from 1900 through 1924, 7.6%; from 1925 through 1949, 7.5%; from 1950 through 1974, 9.9%; from 1975 through 1999, 16.9%; from 2000 through 2024, 7.6%.
As of 8/18/25. Total return estimated using price index levels from Bloomberg and Robert J. Shiller’s data and dividend yield data from Bloomberg and Multpl.com.
Source – RBC Global Asset Management, Robert J. Shiller, Bloomberg, Multpl.com
It is worth also reflecting on key forces and events that cast a long shadow over the quarter century but that have ceased to be material economic drivers.
Forecasting is easy – it’s the “getting it right” part that is hard. It must be emphasized that most of what comes next is speculative in nature.
It is arguably a failure of imagination that so many of the expected themes constitute the continuation of existing themes. But the reality is that many forces exert themselves over time periods even longer than a quarter century.
The line chart shows fertility rates (births per woman) of nine G20 countries from 1965 through 2023. All of them were lower in 2023 than they were in 1965. Mexico was at 6.8 in 1965 (the highest), 3.4 in 1990, and 1.9 in 2023. China was at 6.6 in 1965 (second-highest), 2.5 in 1990, and 0.99 in 2023. Brazil was at 5.7 in 1965 (third-highest), 2.9 in 1990, and 1.6 in 2023. South Korea was at 4.9 in 1965, 1.6 in 1990, and 0.7 in 2023. Canada was at 3.1 in 1965, 1.8 in 1990, and 1.3 in 2023. United States was at 2.91 in 1965, 2.1 in 1990, and 1.6 in 2023. United Kingdom was at 2.86 in 1965, 1.8 in 1990, and 1.56 in 2023. Germany was at 2.5 in 1965, 1.45 in 1990, and 1.39 in 2023. Japan was at 2.1 in 1965, 1.5 in 1990, and 1.2 in 2023.
Source – World Bank; data through 2023
Now we turn to new themes that may have legs – and could remain relevant for years to come.
The line chart shows the ratio of the five-year growth of real export of goods to the rate of growth for real GDP. Since the late 1990s, the ratio has trended generally downwards, from a high of roughly 2.3 in 1997 to roughly 0.6 in 2024.
As of 2024. Ratio of 5-year growth of real export of goods to that of real GDP. Shaded areas represent U.S. recessions.
Source – RBC Global Asset Management, International Monetary Fund, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), OECD, Macrobond
Finally, we contemplate fresh new themes that could prove highly significant over the next quarter century.
Eric Lascelles is Managing Director & Chief Economist for RBC Global Asset Management Inc. (RBC GAM). He maintains the firm’s global economic forecast and advises its portfolio managers on key themes and risks. Eric is also a member of the RBC Investment Strategy Committee (RISC), which is responsible for RBC GAM’s global asset mix recommendations. In his two decades as an economist, Eric has also worked as a bank economist for another large financial institution, as a trading floor economist, and as a fixed income strategist.
The material herein is for informational purposes only and is not directed at, nor intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity in any country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Royal Bank of Canada or its subsidiaries or constituent business units (including RBC Wealth Management) to any licensing or registration requirement within such country.
This is not intended to be either a specific offer by any Royal Bank of Canada entity to sell or provide, or a specific invitation to apply for, any particular financial account, product or service. Royal Bank of Canada does not offer accounts, products or services in jurisdictions where it is not permitted to do so, and therefore the RBC Wealth Management business is not available in all countries or markets.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as professional advice or opinion provided to the user, nor as a recommendation of any particular approach. Nothing in this material constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice and you are advised to seek independent legal, tax and accounting advice prior to acting upon anything contained in this material. Interest rates, market conditions, tax and legal rules and other important factors which will be pertinent to your circumstances are subject to change. This material does not purport to be a complete statement of the approaches or steps that may be appropriate for the user, does not take into account the user’s specific investment objectives or risk tolerance and is not intended to be an invitation to effect a securities transaction or to otherwise participate in any investment service.
To the full extent permitted by law neither RBC Wealth Management nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this document or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this material may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of RBC Wealth Management. RBC Wealth Management is the global brand name to describe the wealth management business of the Royal Bank of Canada and its affiliates and branches, including, RBC Investment Services (Asia) Limited, Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch, and the Royal Bank of Canada, Singapore Branch. Additional information available upon request.
Royal Bank of Canada is duly established under the Bank Act (Canada), which provides limited liability for shareholders.
® Registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under license. RBC Wealth Management is a registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under license. Copyright © Royal Bank of Canada 2025. All rights reserved.
We want to talk about your financial future.