A central bank at rest tends to stay at rest

Analysis
Insights

The Federal Reserve held rates steady once again, but with the added wrinkle of a hawkish outlook – likely pushing back the timing of any rate cut even further.

Share

July 31, 2025

Thomas Garretson, CFA
Senior Portfolio Strategist
Fixed Income Strategies
Portfolio Advisory Group–U.S.

So goes Newton’s first law of motion: an object that is not moving will remain stationary unless a force is applied to it. And if one thing was clear from this week’s Fed meeting – absent an outside force – the Fed is more than content to remain at rest by keeping rates unchanged.

The Fed left its policy rate at a target range of 4.25–4.50 percent for the fifth consecutive meeting, as was widely expected. In his press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell summed up the justification for doing so succinctly, “It seems to me, and to almost the whole committee, that the economy is not performing as if restrictive policy is holding it back inappropriately. Modestly restrictive policy seems appropriate.”

We find that sentiment hard to argue with. When the Fed delivered the first of a series of rate cuts last September, core PCE inflation was running at an annual rate of 2.7 percent; as of this morning’s release for July data, that pace has picked up slightly to 2.8 percent. Similarly, the unemployment rate was 4.1 percent last September and has continued to hold steady around that level this year.

So, with little changed with respect to both sides of the Fed’s mandate of price stability and maximum employment, it seems to us the inertia behind current policy rates will remain. Market expectations of a rate cut now imply less than a 50 percent chance of a move, compared to nearly 70 percent prior to the meeting. We now expect a rate cut by December at the earliest.

Outside, and inside, forces

While the meeting was short on any real surprises, there were two notable developments: Powell’s perceived hawkishness and two dovish policy dissents from governors.

On the first, Powell was quick to note that the potential inflationary impacts of tariffs are likely only just beginning. With more trade deals announced this week, and many tariffs finally to be implemented as of August 1, it will likely still take several months for any impact to show in the data. He also pointed out that rising goods prices, and potential for them to rise further, could arguably justify rate hikes.

Beyond tariff risks, we think there’s another factor behind the Fed’s hawkish tone this week – financial conditions have rarely been this easy and are now nearly the easiest since the Fed started raising rates in 2022. Record-high stock indexes, tight corporate credit spreads to Treasury yields, and a weakening dollar are financial factors that could pose upside risks to inflation while bolstering economic activity. We believe cutting rates when financial conditions are already this easy amid a solid economic backdrop would likely amplify those risks.

Easy financial conditions no condition to cut rates

Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index

Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index

The chart shows an index of financial conditions, comprising a broad measure of stock prices, exchange rates, credit spreads, and long-term bond yields, from 1990 through 2025. The chart shows financial conditions were tight from 1990 until around 1997. Conditions were looser until around 2001 when they tightened again. Conditions then became less tight and were around the average level until around 2008 when they sharply tightened. They again became less tight and were generally around the average level until 2020 when they sharply loosened. Conditions returned to around the average level in 2023 and then began to loosen again in 2024. The chart shows the tightest conditions corresponded to periods of U.S. recessions. Easier financial conditions tend to support stronger economic activity and firmer inflationary pressures.

  • Average

Notes: Grey bars show U.S. recessions; higher numbers (red) = tighter conditions and lower numbers (green) = looser conditions

Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index

In the other direction, an outside force attempting to exert downward energy on rates is, of course, President Donald Trump. His attacks on Powell continued this week, but following recent developments with the Fed’s renovation project, we think near-term risks of his firing “for cause” have faded. We still hold some reservation, particularly if the Fed stays on hold until December, that the President’s patience could run thin and that things could reach a boiling point.

Finally, there were inside forces acting on the Fed at this week’s meeting. Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman dissented at this week’s meeting in favour of lowering the policy rate by a quarter of a point.

It’s the first time that two governors, of the seven that typically comprise the board, have dissented since 1993. As a practical matter it doesn’t matter much, and differing views are welcomed at the Fed, but Powell’s hawkish tone suggests to us that they remain outliers at the Fed and that the core of the committee supports the ongoing wait-and-see approach.

That said, Waller has been the most outspoken on rate cuts, making the case that the Fed should move to get ahead of looming labour market risks – but does he have a case?

Working hard, or hardly working?

Labour market data, by and large, remain solid – but mixed. As noted, the unemployment rate has remained flat, if not edged lower, this year as moderating labour demand has been offset by a modest decline in the labour supply.

While there are numerous data measures to track, one of the best to our eyes is consumer labour market sentiment. The percentage of consumers viewing jobs as “hard to get” has one of the higher correlations with the official unemployment rate.

Cooling consumer labour market sentiment suggests upside risk to unemployment rate

Correlation between indexes of consumer labour market sentiment and the unemployment rate

The chart shows the correlation between indexes of consumer labour market sentiment and the unemployment rate. Higher percentages of people viewing jobs as “hard to get” in the labour market tend to correlate with a higher unemployment rate.

  • 1950–2019
  • 2022–now
  • July estimate

Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg, Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index; data from 1959 to 2025 (2020 and 2021 excluded due to extreme values; correlation = 90 percent)

An index of the percentage of people seeing jobs as “hard to get” rose this week to 19 percent for July up from around 14 percent at the start of the year, despite the unemployment rate remaining flat. Historically, when that index has been around 20 percent, the unemployment rate has been closer to five percent. We certainly don’t see unemployment rising to that level anytime soon, but it suggests upside risk to the current unemployment rate of 4.1 percent, beginning with tomorrow’s Nonfarm Payrolls Employment report for July.

In our view, it simply reflects a normal decline in sentiment that tends to come at the later stages of most economic expansions and is not yet a sign that the labour market is near the point of cracking.

A return of “higher for longer”?

Absent an outside force, we think the inertia behind the current level of interest rates is likely to remain.

Recent stock and corporate bond market rallies have been fueled, at least in part, by market expectations that although rate cuts have been delayed, it would only mean more rate cuts next year.

While we currently anticipate multiple rate cuts in the pipeline from the December meeting moving forward, it was only back in March that RBC Capital Markets analysts projected no rate cuts through 2026. With the worst of the tariff threats now seemingly in the rearview mirror and steady economic performance, the bias could be back toward that type of outcome.


The material herein is for informational purposes only and is not directed at, nor intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity in any country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Royal Bank of Canada or its subsidiaries or constituent business units (including RBC Wealth Management) to any licensing or registration requirement within such country.

This is not intended to be either a specific offer by any Royal Bank of Canada entity to sell or provide, or a specific invitation to apply for, any particular financial account, product or service. Royal Bank of Canada does not offer accounts, products or services in jurisdictions where it is not permitted to do so, and therefore the RBC Wealth Management business is not available in all countries or markets.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as professional advice or opinion provided to the user, nor as a recommendation of any particular approach. Nothing in this material constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice and you are advised to seek independent legal, tax and accounting advice prior to acting upon anything contained in this material. Interest rates, market conditions, tax and legal rules and other important factors which will be pertinent to your circumstances are subject to change. This material does not purport to be a complete statement of the approaches or steps that may be appropriate for the user, does not take into account the user’s specific investment objectives or risk tolerance and is not intended to be an invitation to effect a securities transaction or to otherwise participate in any investment service.

To the full extent permitted by law neither RBC Wealth Management nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this document or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this material may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of RBC Wealth Management. RBC Wealth Management is the global brand name to describe the wealth management business of the Royal Bank of Canada and its affiliates and branches, including, RBC Investment Services (Asia) Limited, Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch, and the Royal Bank of Canada, Singapore Branch. Additional information available upon request.

Royal Bank of Canada is duly established under the Bank Act (Canada), which provides limited liability for shareholders.

® Registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under license. RBC Wealth Management is a registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under license. Copyright © Royal Bank of Canada 2025. All rights reserved.


Thomas Garretson, CFA

Senior Portfolio Strategist
Fixed Income Strategies
Portfolio Advisory Group–U.S.

Let’s connect


We want to talk about your financial future.

Related articles

Another round of the Fed’s waiting game

Analysis 6 minute read
- Another round of the Fed’s waiting game

A short fuse on long bonds

Analysis 7 minute read
- A short fuse on long bonds

2025 Midyear Outlook: United States

Analysis 5 minute read
- 2025 Midyear Outlook: United States