Kevin Warsh launches his own Fed renovation project

Insights

This week brought the highly anticipated first policy meeting under the Warsh regime at the Fed. We look at how the Warsh era kicked off and how the central bank may evolve under its new chair.

23 June 2026 | 7 minute read

By Thomas Garretson, CFA

For someone who has explicitly called for “regime change” at the U.S. Federal Reserve, Kevin Warsh’s first meeting as chair of the central bank probably shouldn’t have come as a surprise, but by the initial market reaction, it clearly did.

Though much of this week’s meeting focused on potential changes to how the Fed operates, we think the initial proposals made by Warsh are largely superficial. The bigger surprise came in a foundational shift in where the broader policymaking committee sees rates heading – and that is potentially higher.

Up first: New set of blinds

Warsh has made it no secret that he is not a fan of forward guidance or excessive Fed communications. The Fed’s output under its chairs has expanded from essentially nothing during the Alan Greenspan era in the early 1990s, to the first quarterly press conferences under Ben Bernanke in 2007 and later the Fed’s document containing economic and interest rate projections, to press conferences at every meeting under Jerome Powell starting in 2019 along with other efforts. By Bloomberg’s estimates, that culminated in over 75,000 words published in 2025 via the Fed’s various publications, compared to barely 300 in 1995.

Perhaps things risked getting to the point where if you wanted to invite Powell to your kid’s birthday party to explain the Fed’s latest rate decision while making balloon animals, you could. Maybe the chances weren’t great that he would show up, but they also weren’t zero.

So sure, there’s probably room to start dialling things back, and Warsh did just that. This week’s policy statement was culled to just 130 words, down from 341 at the April meeting.

We think there was a bigger change that has perhaps flown under the radar. For the past 25 years or so, the results of the policy vote, both in favour and against, have been published in the statement.

But at the top of this meeting’s policy statement, this appeared: “The Federal Open Market Committee approved the following statement for release by a 12-0 vote” (emphasis ours). While that is indeed a vote result, prior statements referenced the vote tally for or against monetary policy action. We think the distinction is significant.

Our view is that the change was made to reflect the massive reduction in the size and scope of the policy statement and to signal that the change was unanimous and not just Warsh walking in with a chainsaw. But we also think that sentence will be deleted going forward, and that monetary policy voting results will no longer be publicised as part of official policy statements.

If so, that could give Warsh cover. One risk many market participants have flagged was the potential for the Fed chair to cast a dissenting vote on policy decisions, something without real precedent. For example, if a simple majority of the 12-person voting committee votes to raise rates – now a real risk as we’ll discuss shortly – there would be less headline risk on decision days, at least in the immediate aftermath.

Regardless, it appears that Warsh truly wants to put up blinds on the Fed’s windows. Though we don’t see it as a major issue for markets, it could inject some volatility amid the added uncertainty.

Assessing the foundation

And speaking of blinds, the window into the Fed’s thinking on interest rates remains open, at least for now. The big surprise at this week’s meeting, in our view, was the sheer number of policymakers pencilling in rate hikes this year with nine of the 18 submissions seeing at least one hike; of those, five saw two hikes and one projected three (Warsh did not submit a forecast as, again, he doesn’t believe in offering forward guidance).

While much has been made about the Middle East conflict’s impact on oil prices, inflation, and the related shift in the market’s pricing of rate hikes from central banks, we have maintained that this was missing the bigger picture and has waned in importance with respect to the interest rate outlook.

As the chart shows, the incoming U.S. economic data has rarely been better, and has had a strong correlation with market-based pricing of rate cut and rate hike expectations. With economic data surprises running near multi-year highs, markets simply see a fundamental case for rate hikes, especially as inflation remains above the Fed’s two percent target and at risk of running even higher if the economy runs hotter.

Rising Fed rate hike expectations may simply reflect strengthening economic data

Rising Fed rate hike expectations may simply reflect strengthening economic data
  • Citigroup Economic Surprise Index (left)
  • Year-ahead implied federal funds rate (right)

Note: Economic Surprise Index advanced by eight weeks; one-year forward rate based on overnight indexed swap data.

Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg, Citigroup

The chart compares the Citigroup Economic Surprise Index and the year-ahead implied federal funds rate based on overnight indexed swap data since March 2023. The Economic Surprise Index is advanced by eight weeks to facilitate comparison. The surprise index and implied federal funds rate have moved roughly in parallel over the period shown. Both have been trending generally upwards since late 2025.

Getting to work: Task Force Five

For anyone who has worked at a company, they’ve probably seen something like this. Warsh announced five task forces on: communications, the Fed’s balance sheet, data sources, productivity and jobs, and inflation frameworks. He often cited these task forces when asked specific questions and though they featured heavily during his press conference as a key initiative, we think the universal truth of these sorts of reviews will remain true: some things change, most don’t. Additionally, much of what Warsh has proposed already exists at the Fed, or these reviews have been conducted previously.

Our base case, though, is that press conferences are pared back to an as-needed basis and that the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections – or at least the “dot plot” (the committee’s projections of interest rates) – goes the way of the dodo bird. But really, as we see it, the Fed is bad at forecasting rates. Markets are bad at forecasting rates. Everyone is pretty bad at forecasting rates. The dot plot was a nice-to-have thing, but maybe not a need-to-have. Again, tweaks here and there, but nothing we see as materially moving the needle.

Letting the dust settle

The Fed meeting sparked significant market swings, with the policy-expectations-sensitive two-year Treasury yield seeing large moves along with stock market declines – but both have already been unwound to varying degrees. Though uncertainty remains high with respect to what comes next, the bar for rate hikes has certainly been lowered.

Still, if we had to game out for investors what the first year under Warsh looks like, it could look like this. Though he was likely brought in by President Donald Trump to lead the charge toward lower interest rates, we believe those are firmly off the table. Warsh may try to keep hikes off the table, but his reputation has always been as an inflation hawk. Therefore, while he might not vote to raise rates, we don’t think he’ll stand in the voting committee’s way if that’s where the votes fall. And during his press conference, he certainly didn’t stand in the way of the rate hike sentiment that appears to be percolating amongst the committee.

Ultimately, Warsh could see near-term rate hikes as necessary to finally get inflation back down to the two percent target. On top of that, the math next year should work in favour of lower inflation readings as the data will “lap” current high inflation numbers north of four percent. Our current forecast has annual headline Consumer Price Index inflation at just 1.5 percent in Q2 of next year. At that point, he could claim the inflation victory that had eluded Powell to this point and then rally the troops around a more significant easing cycle that is perhaps aided by an AI-induced productivity boom that fuels strong economic growth and labour market strength, but without the inflationary pressures.

We shall see, but this week could have marked a bigger – or at least earlier – shake-up at the Fed than many had been prepared for.

Tagged with


This publication has been issued by RBC’s Wealth Management international division in the United Kingdom and the Channel Islands which is comprised of an international network of RBC® companies located in these jurisdictions and includes RBC Europe Limited and Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by RBC’s Wealth Management international division.

This publication has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgements as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, the value of investments and income arising can go down, future returns are not guaranteed, and an investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products and services which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities or services discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.

This material is prepared for general circulation and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law none of the entities which comprise the international division of RBC Wealth Management nor any of their affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of RBC Wealth Management.

Clients of RBC Europe Limited may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) if it cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. For further information about the compensation provided by the FSCS scheme (including the amounts covered and eligibility to claim) please refer to the FSCS website FSCS.org.uk. Please note only compensation related queries should be directed to the FSCS. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
RBC Europe Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 995939. Its registered office is 100 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 4AA. RBC Europe Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.

Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited (“the Bank”) is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of deposit taking, fund services and investment business in Jersey. The Bank’s general terms and conditions are updated from time to time and can be found at https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-uk/terms-and-conditions. Registered office: Gaspé House, 66-72 Esplanade, St. Helier, Jersey JE2 3QT, Channel Islands. Deposits made with Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited in Jersey are not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme (the Scheme). The Scheme aims to provide protection for eligible depositors of up to £50,000. For further information about the Scheme and to understand your eligibility, please refer to www.jrdca.org.je/jdcs.

Investment services offered by the Bank are not covered by an investor compensation scheme as there is currently no such scheme operating in Jersey, however ‘eligible deposits’ held pursuant to investment services may be protected under the Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme described above – for more information see the Bank’s general terms and conditions. Some of the products that the Bank might recommend to you could be registered overseas and may be covered by a local compensation scheme. Your investment counsellor will provide you with the details of any overseas compensation schemes (where applicable) at the time of making an investment recommendation.

Copies of the latest audited accounts are available upon request from the registered office.
® / ™ Trademark(s) of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under licence.


Thomas Garretson, CFA

Senior Portfolio Strategist
Fixed Income Strategies
Portfolio Advisory Group–U.S.

Related articles

Bond markets seeing the forest for the trees

8 min read
Bond markets seeing the forest for the trees

Fed change is afoot, in more ways than one

Global insights 7 min read
Fed change is afoot, in more ways than one

Global Insight 2026 Midyear Outlook: United States

Global insights 5 min read
Global Insight 2026 Midyear Outlook: United States